Penrose-Lucas argument
Penrose-Lucas argument proper noun: an argument based on Gödel's incompleteness theorem, suggesting that the human mind cannot be computed on a Turing machine that works on Peano arithmetic because the latter cannot see the truth value of its Gödel sentence, while a human mind can.
Proper noun
the Penrose-Lucas argument
- An argument based on Gödel's incompleteness theorem, suggesting that the human mind cannot be computed on a Turing machine that works on Peano arithmetic because the latter cannot see the truth value of its Gödel sentence, while a human mind can.
Forms of Penrose-Lucas argument
| alternative form | Lucas-Penrose argument |
|---|
Origin of Penrose-Lucas argument
Named after philosophers John Lucas and Roger Penrose.
Questions about Penrose-Lucas argument
- What does Penrose-Lucas argument mean?
- Penrose-Lucas argument means an argument based on Gödel's incompleteness theorem, suggesting that the human mind cannot be computed on a Turing machine that works on Peano arithmetic because the latter cannot see the truth value of its Gödel sentence, while a human mind can.
- What part of speech is Penrose-Lucas argument?
- Penrose-Lucas argument is a proper noun.
Words near Penrose-Lucas argument in the dictionary
Source and license
Adapted from Wiktionary: Penrose-Lucas argument (page history and authors). Text available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license. Word.ws reformatted the entry and added links. Wiktionary data of 2026-09-02.
Last updated:
Cite this entry: “Penrose-Lucas argument.” Word.ws, https://word.ws/penrose-lucas_argument. Based on Wiktionary, CC BY-SA 4.0.
